| Volume 8, Issue 4, 347-363, 2017 |
|Return to Issue List |
|The subjective-objective dysjunction in psychometrically-defined schizotypy: What it is and why it is important.|
| Alex Cohen - Louisiana State University, Dept of Psychology|
| Kyle Mitchell - Louisiana State University, Dept of Psychology|
| Melissa Beck - Louisiana State University, Dept of Psychology|
| Jason Hicks - Louisiana State University, Dept of Psychology|
|Volume 8, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 347-363|
An interesting set of findings has emerged from the literature regarding schizotypy. Individuals with psychometric schizotypy self-report pathology in certain neuropsychological concerns, affective experiences, expressive/communicative, olfactory experience abilities and subjective quality of life generally at levels between one and two standard deviations more severe than their non-schizotypal peers; a level often similar to that seen in chronic schizophrenia. Objectively however, individuals with psychometric schizotypy do not show concomitant impairments in these domains. This dysjunction is remarkable in that samples are largely drawn from college settings; thus likely reflecting the healthiest individuals within the schizophrenia-spectrum. We propose that this dysjunction can be conceptualized as a “cognitive bias”, and that it reflects a dysfunction in the systems underlying appraisal, self-evaluation and/or self-reporting processes. In this article, we lay out evidence underlying the subjective-objective dysjunction and discuss potential methodological and psychological issues that may explain this phenomenon.
|Table of Contents|
The Subjective-Objective Disjunction in Schizotypy Operationalized
Quality of Life
What Might, or Might Not Underlie the Subjective-Objective Disjunction?
Not Simply a Global Response Bias
Possibly a Cognitive Bias
Potential Mechanisms: A Reasoning Bias?
Closing: Towards Meaningful Vulnerability Markers of Schizotypy
|Dr. Alex Cohen |
|schizophrenia, schizotypy, cognitive, bias, emotion, anhedonia, subjective, objective, olfaction, |
|Received 17 Feb 2016; Revised 8 Jun 2017; Accepted 8 Jun 2017; In Press 22 Jul 2017 |